Modern day, data backup solutions have transitioned from traditional tape and hardware-depended solutions to cloud-based solutions. These solutions offer businesses more efficient and faster ways of recovering critical data in case of any disruption.

Even though both the public and private sectors have accepted the cloud, there are still some concerns about moving data to the cloud and relying on the cloud to continue their operations smoothly should a primary server fail.

When evaluating a cloud-based data backup and recovery solution, it’s important for businesses first to think through their IT goals. They should also factor in the never-ending budget concerns.
So, businesses should consider these factors before moving to cloud-based data recovery solutions.

Cloud cost analysis

It’s the desire of every business to store all their data in the cloud, but, budget decisions force these businesses to make a judgment call on the most critical data. So, when pursuing integrated cloud recovery, businesses should consider which technology fits their budget.

The businesses make their cost considerations based on the following factors: the nature of the backup and recovery files, server images for both virtual and physical servers, databases and the necessary support. Also, businesses should factor in operational expenditures and scalability related to pricing.

Determining the desired backup speed

As the size of datasets continues to increase, the best solution is one which can support capacity and also provide the required backup speed. Speed is very critical as it helps in meeting the backup window and recovering the data quickly. A high-speed data transfer assists businesses to ensure that their systems and applications are backed up within the specified timeframe and with minimal disruption.

Transitioning from hardware-focused approach

IT analysts say that the average cost of downtime is $100,000 per hour. What is more surprising is the fact that most businesses experience 10 to 20 hours of unexpected downtime almost every year, and this happens without any natural disaster taking place.

Traditional backup and recovery systems rely on tape backup and hardware which is neither cost effective nor able to handle the increased datasets which exist in businesses today. These systems are also not well-equipped to provide quick recovery in the event of a natural disaster or unexpected downtime.

The hardware approach is expensive as businesses are at times forced to wait for days for some appliances to be replaced. However, transitioning to a direct-to-cloud approach eliminates the need to wait for hardware replacements, thus accelerating data recovery. This enables businesses to recovery data in the cloud, without having to wait for replacements to be made when a disaster happens.

Setting recovery time objective

Before adopting any cloud-based backup and recovery solutions, businesses should consider how long they can go without having to access any data. Therefore, setting recovery time objective gives the businesses parameters needed by IT managers to use when providing backup and restore. This time varies as it can take as long as a day or as short as an hour.

Providing an efficient user experience

For an IT professional, appliance free cloud recovery solutions can be managed from any location. It should allow managers to log in through the internet and start a restore process. Some advanced recovery solutions allow downloading of files without even recovering the entire server image first.

However, the ease of use is one of the ways of evaluating cloud-based data recovery options. Businesses should also expect a 24/7 technical support from their services providers.

The issues discussed above are a good beginning in evaluating the transition to a direct-to-cloud platform. Cloud computing will continue to grow, and this is driven by the growth of data and the need to provide faster backup solutions to protect critical files. So, the future of fast and reliable data recovery solutions lies in the cloud, as traditional backup and recovery solutions have proven to be costly and unreliable.